Beyond Disagreement : Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication
Aruna. Sathanapally
Bok Engelsk 2013 · Electronic books.
| Annen tittel | |
|---|---|
| Utgitt | Oxford : : Oxford University Press, , 2013.
|
| Omfang | 1 online resource (542 p.)
|
| Opplysninger | Description based upon print version of record.. - Cover Page; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; Abbreviations; Introduction; A. The Point of Departure; B. The Subject of this Book; C. Chapter Overview; Part I. Typology and Interactions; Chapter 1. Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication; 1.A Introduction; 1.B Weak-Form Review Considered; 1.C The Variety of Open Remedies; 1.D Shared Rationales for Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication; 1.E The Judicial Function and Objections to Open Remedies; 1.F Conclusion; Chapter 2. The Role of the Legislature; 2.A Introduction. - 2.B The New Dialogue Scholarship2.C Dialogue and Declarations of Incompatibility; 2.D Two Models of Court-Legislature Interaction; 2.E Sidestepping Legislative Reality: Two Concerns; Chapter 3. From Dialogue to Engagement; 3.A Introduction; 3.B Applying the Deliberative Turn in Democratic Theory; 3.C Instability and Compliance-Oriented Rights Review; 3.D The International Legal Dimension; 3.E A Framework for the Examination of Declarations of Incompatibility; Part II. Declarations of Incompatibility in the Courts; Chapter 4. The Criteria for a Declaration of Incompatibility; 4.A Introduction. - 4.B The Architecture of the HRA4.C The Limits of Section 3 HRA; 4.D An Effective Remedy for the Litigant; 4.E Conclusion; Chapter 5. Judicial Restraint and Activism Considered; 5.A Introduction; 5.B Expository Justice; 5.C The Strasbourg Dimension; 5.D Conclusion; Part III. Responsive Deliberation in Practice; Chapter 6. The Pattern of Institutional Dialogue; 6.A Introduction; 6.B Statistics and Policy; 6.C The Legislature's Role after Declarations of Incompatibility; 6.D A Quick and Willing Response: 2000-2004; 6.E The Space for Political Decision-Making. - 6.F The Joint Committee on Human Rights6.G Conclusion; Chapter 7. Remedial Deliberation in the Legislature; 7.A Introduction; 7.B Exploring the Legislative Capacity Rationale: The Response to Bellinger; 7.C Difficulties with Legislative Remedies: The Retrospectivity Problem; 7.D Bringing Parliament Along or Avoiding Deliberation? The Prisoner Voting Saga; 7.E Conclusion; Chapter 8. Belmarsh Prisoners and Dialogue over Control Orders; 8.A Introduction; 8.B The Reaction to the Belmarsh Prisoners Decision; 8.C The Reply Legislation and Legislative Deliberation; 8.D Dialogue over Control Orders. - 8.E ConclusionChapter 9. Epilogue; 9.A The Dominant Dynamic; 9.B Prisoner Voting Revisited; 9.C Reforming the Institutional Settlement on Human Rights?; Conclusion; Appendix 1: Table of DOIs; Appendix 2: Empirical Data; Index; Footnotes. - Examining the role of 'open remedies' in human rights adjudication, this book provides a new perspective informing comparative constitutional debates on how to structure institutional relationships over fundamental rights and freedoms.Open remedies declare a human rights violation but invite the other branches of government to decide what corrective action should be taken. Open remedies are premised on the need to engage institutions beyond courts in the process of thinking about and acting on human rights problems. This book considers examples across the United States, South Africa, Canada, a
|
| Emner | |
| Sjanger | |
| Dewey | |
| ISBN | 9780199669301
|
