The Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention


Dan. Kuwali
Bok Engelsk 2010 · Electronic books.
Annen tittel
Utgitt
Leiden : : BRILL, , 2010.
Omfang
1 online resource (552 p.)
Opplysninger
Description based upon print version of record.. - Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes. - 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? - Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? - Supranational Statutory Intervention. - 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention. - 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity?. - 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention?. - F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa. - This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.
Emner
Sjanger
Geografisk emneord
Afrika : (NO-TrBIB)HUME01540
Dewey
ISBN
9789004191716

Bibliotek som har denne